Cases 81 - 90 of 97
O'Neal v. Sirmons et al
as 5:2007cv01090
Petitioner:
Travis L O'Neal
Respondent:
Marty Sirmons and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallett v. Dinwiddie et al
as 5:2007cv01078
Petitioner:
Robert Mallett, II
Respondent:
Walter Dinwiddie and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. Sirmons et al
as 4:2007cv00542
Petitioner:
Wayne Henry Garrison
Respondent:
Marty Sirmons and W A Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troutt v. Jones et al
as 5:2007cv01062
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Troutt
Respondent:
Justin Jones, John Doe, Charles Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reese v. Provence et al
as 5:2007cv01024
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Brent Reese
Respondent:
Greg Provence and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacobsen v. Jones et al
as 5:2007cv01004
Petitioner:
Steven Jacobsen
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v Sirmons
as 6:2007cv00238
Petitioner:
Billy Monroe Hicks
Respondent:
Marty Sirmons and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Campbell v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2007cv00593
Petitioner:
Michael A Campbell
Respondent:
John Whetsel and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Sirmons et al
as 5:2007cv00573
Petitioner:
Darrell Wayne Bailey
Respondent:
Marty Sirmons and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bramlett v. Jones et al
as 5:2007cv00430
Petitioner:
Robert Clarence Bramlett
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
