Cases 81 - 90 of 55,815
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00882
Petitioner:
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey and Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Khouanmany v. Painter
as 2:2024cv01189
Petitioner:
Vilaychith Khonamany
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rigoberto Luna Luna v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03293
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Luna Luna
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alan Anderson v. Bryan Burkholz
as 2:2024cv01761
Petitioner:
Alan Anderson
Respondent:
Bryan Burkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Newman v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2024cv02167
Petitioner:
Charles Newman
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce Haney v. L. Lundy
as 2:2024cv03159
Petitioner:
Bruce Haney
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Rivas v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2024cv03231
Petitioner:
Anthony Rivas
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dyer v. Pearce
as 3:2024cv01405
Petitioner:
Jewel E. Dyer
Respondent:
Timothy Pearce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aurelio Martinez Rodriguez v. Brian Birkholtz
as 2:2024cv01579
Petitioner:
Aurelio Martinez Rodriguez
Respondent:
Brian Birkholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
