Cases 81 - 90 of 14,960
Poindexter v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01258
Petitioner:
Dewell Poindexter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frederick v. Uhler
as 9:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Marquise Frederick
Respondent:
Donald J. Uhler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Goodman
as 2:2024cv01353
Petitioner:
Jua Smith
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Lilley
as 9:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
David J. Decker
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCargo v. Jamison
as 1:2024cv02367
Petitioner:
Kareem McCargo
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCray v. New York State
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Ricardo McCray
Defendant:
New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Cook
as 1:2024cv01655
Petitioner:
Robert Brown
Respondent:
Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center
as 9:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Respondent:
Onondaga County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Doe v. NYC Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01139
Petitioner:
John Doe
Respondent:
NYC Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arroyo v. District Attorney, Queens County et al
as 1:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Anibal Arroyo
Defendant:
District Attorney Queens County, Ian Ramae, Esq. and Assistant District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
