Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Derrick v. Cain
as 2:2020cv01658
Respondent:
B. Cain
Petitioner:
Robert L. Derrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Toreson v. Kelly
as 6:2019cv00078
Respondent:
B. Kelly
Petitioner:
Theodore O. Toreson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Traynor et al
as 6:2018cv00785
Respondent:
Flora Salcido, Dr. Gundru, Sharp and others
Petitioner:
George Patton Nelson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Music v. B. Trapp
as 6:2017cv01617
Defendant:
B. Trapp
Plaintiff:
John George Music
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Kelly
as 6:2017cv00958
Petitioner:
Dameion Douglas
Respondent:
B. Kelly
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Childs v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00360
Respondent:
Ms. B Amsberry
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen, Kristen E. Boyd and Lisa Hay
Petitioner:
Jeremy Eugene Childs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herlong v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00326
Respondent:
Ms. B. Amsberry
Petitioner:
James Wesley Herlong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenyon et al v. State or Oregon et al
as 3:2015cv02295
Respondent:
County of Multnomah, State or Oregon and Judith L. Swanson
Petitioner:
B. P. K., T. F. K. and Shane Timothy Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sills v. Koehn et al
as 1:2015cv00811
Respondent:
B Koehn and Ellen F. Rosenblum
Petitioner:
Gabriel Sills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sills v. Long et al
as 1:2014cv00638
Respondent:
John R. Kroger and Warden David B. Long
Petitioner:
Gabriel Sills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
