Cases 1 - 10 of 28
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LUZUNARIS v. MORROGH
as 1:2022cv01698
Petitioner:
JOSE LUZUNARIS
Respondent:
RAYMOND F. MORROGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AL-ZARNOUQI et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2006cv01767
Petitioner:
MOHAMED AL-ZARNOUQI, MASHOUR ABDULLAH MUQBEL ALSABRI, MOHAMED MUQBEL AHMED ALSABRI and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, HARRY B. HARRIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DONALD v. MELGREN
as 1:2019cv02312
Defendant:
ERIC F. MELGREN
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKS v. MOON et al
as 1:2018cv00715
Petitioner:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent:
ROBERT MOON, DERRICK CARLESLIE, CHRISTY D. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
as 1:2017cv01268
Petitioner:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA
as 1:2016cv02418
Petitioner:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ARIZONA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv00601
Petitioner:
JEONG SEON HAN
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and PAUL F. ZUKUNFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HATHAWAY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01030
Petitioner:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DURONIO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2013cv00437
Petitioner:
ROGER F. DURONIO
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
