Cases 1 - 10 of 31
RIVERA GARCIA v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv03803
Petitioner:
JORGE F RIVERA GARCIA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TRONCOSO et al v. NEWJERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY et al
as 1:2023cv16053
Petitioner:
DAVID TRONCOSO and MELODY TRONCOSO
Respondent:
NEWJERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, KATRINA TATEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
CRUZ v. TAYLOR
as 1:2023cv03305
Petitioner:
JOSE F. CRUZ
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CRUZ v. TAYLOR
as 1:2022cv07565
Petitioner:
JOSE F CRUZ
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMART v. LEITH
as 1:2022cv02250
Petitioner:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Respondent:
WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AVILA v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv09422
Petitioner:
ABDIEL F. AVILA
Respondent:
STEVE JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FONTANEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv11826
Petitioner:
AUDELIZ F FONTANEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PHILLIPS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv05158
Petitioner:
IRVIN PAUL PHILLIPS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANCORA HOSPITAL and RICHARD F WELLS
Defendant:
ALAN MASRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURRAN v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2015cv02770
Petitioner:
JOHN F. CURRAN, III
Respondent:
JORDAN W. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RYAN v. D'LLIO et al
as 1:2015cv00056
Petitioner:
SAMUEL F. RYAN
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'LLIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
