Cases 1 - 10 of 1,027
Wheat v. Creuzot
as 3:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
John Creuzot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John v. Grant
as 3:2024cv00957
Petitioner:
Robert Charles John
Respondent:
NFN Grant, Warden and Dr S Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01262
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pelko v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
John D Pelko
Respondent:
Sheriff J.C. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oluwaseun v. Mayokas et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Shomefun Oluwaseun and John Dee
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayokas, Charles Markos, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Conlin v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Conlin, John Doe and Texas Doe
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04582
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
West v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02717
Petitioner:
John William West
Respondent:
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
