Cases 1 - 10 of 212
GAY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
MAURICE GAY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, MAJOR C. SEARS, MS. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2023cv01260
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv06307
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JAMES SLAUGHTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv05497
Petitioner:
JEROME JOHNSON
Respondent:
WARDEN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv05207
Petitioner:
TONYE JOHNSON
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. N'DIAYE
as 1:2021cv19193
Petitioner:
JEROME JOHNSON
Respondent:
LAMINE N'DIAYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RANDONE v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2021cv15265
Petitioner:
JOSEPH RANDONE
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv13587
Petitioner:
DERECK JOHNSON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. WARDEN, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2021cv04388
Petitioner:
SHAQUAN R. JOHNSON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. BERGAMI
as 1:2021cv02681
Respondent:
THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Petitioner:
LARRY RAY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
