Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Mazzucco v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Dominic Gabriel Mazzucco
Respondent:
Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paulus, Todd v. Silao-Johnson, Maria
as 3:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Todd Paulus, IV
Respondent:
Maria Silao-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson, Maurice v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson, Jr. and Maurice M. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Racine Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Jaime Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01130
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDade v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv01035
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lovell McDade, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carolina v. Johnson
as 2:2023cv00836
Petitioner:
Cornelius Carolina
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spencer v. Wells
as 2:2023cv00820
Petitioner:
Robert Darius Spencer
Respondent:
Johnson and Warden Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson, Joseph v. Attorney General of Wisconsin
as 3:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Johnson
Respondent:
Attorney General of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
