Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Codner v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2022cv61878
Plaintiff:
Randolph Cordell Codner and Jah Rastafari Malchizedek
Defendant:
State of Florida, Ron DeSantis, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randolph v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv14147
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Randolph and Tommie Randolph
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Codner v. State of Florida
as 0:2020cv61831
Plaintiff:
Randolph Codner and Jah Rastafari Malchizdek
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hurley v. Office of General Counsel
as 1:2020cv21609
Defendant:
Florida Commission On Offender Review
Plaintiff:
Randolph Hurley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randolph v. Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00021
Petitioner:
Vinson Randolph
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2017cv00212
Petitioner:
Jaques D. Randolph
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. JONES
as 1:2017cv00099
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH JACKSON
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Codner v. Schwartz
as 0:2017cv60008
Petitioner:
Randolph Cordell Codner
Respondent:
Frank Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00243
Petitioner:
Randolph Clark
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCray v. Marlow et al
as 9:2016cv80363
Plaintiff:
Major Randolph McCray
Defendant:
R. Marlow , Florida Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
