Cases 1 - 10 of 20
REED v. SHAFFER
as 1:2024cv01890
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
BRIAN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2023cv03117
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 1:2022cv01653
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED and ROBERT ANDREW BEY
Respondent:
CHRIS WHITMER, UNITED STATES PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. TISCHNER et al
as 1:2022cv00855
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
RICHARD S. TISCHNER and JENNIFER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CUTCHIN v. SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
DEMANNE CUTCHIN
Defendant:
SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, ANDREW ROUTH and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. PATTEN
as 1:2021cv03223
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
WANDA PATTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. ANDREWS
as 1:2021cv01326
Petitioner:
STEVEN MOORE
Respondent:
JUSTIN ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BERGERON v. HACKER et al
as 1:2020cv01864
Defendant:
FREEMASONS OF THE UNITED STATES, J. BRITT JOHNSON, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB ANDREW BERGERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REED v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv01491
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LORETTA E LYNCH and DAVID J. EBBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GROSS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01333
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
