Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rapozo v. Hawaii, State of
as 1:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Richard B. Rapozo and Richard Ropozo and Richard Borges Rapozo
Respondent:
Attorney General Hawaii, State of, Warden Shawn Wead and Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
James Dion Palmer
Respondent:
Sheriff, Governor Of Hawaii and Hawaii Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Gregory K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Opunui v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00506
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Patrick Opunui, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Naki v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00507
Respondent:
FDC Honolulu, Attorney General William Barr, United States Marshals Service and others
Petitioner:
Leslie K. Naki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sandeen v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00505
Respondent:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons Honolulu Federal Detention Center, United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Andrew A. Sandeen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schulze v. U. S. Attorney General
as 1:2020cv00090
Petitioner:
Michael F. Schulze
Respondent:
U. S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brisken v. Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
as 1:2018cv00163
Petitioner:
Jhon Nigel Brisken
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fagaragan v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv00591
Petitioner:
Erwin E. Fagaragan
Respondent:
Todd Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grindling v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv00429
Petitioner:
Chris Grindling
Respondent:
Todd Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
