Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Moses v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00647
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levan v. Armstrong
as 4:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Levan, Jr.
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv03308
Petitioner:
Jimmy Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and FNU Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00908
Petitioner:
Jimmy Jackson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Major FNU Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellsworth v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00412
Petitioner:
Donathan Ellsworth
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Warden FNU Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00328
Petitioner:
Kendric Cecil Armstrong
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitmill v. Armstrong
as 4:2019cv03267
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Demond Whitmill
Defendant:
Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Incorrectly Filed Do not docket in 4:18cv04321. File only in 7:18cv00356.
as 4:2018cv04321
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Douglas Tyrone Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
