Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Sergio Gonzlaez v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 12-17374
Petitioner - Appellant:
SERGIO PEREZ GONZLAEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS and RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Charles Wang v. S. Smith, et al
as 12-16820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES WANG
Defendant - Appellee:
S. SMITH, K. SHAPERO, Judge, A. ALEM, Assistant DA and others
Andrew Kwasi Donkor v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv01641
Respondent:
Paul R Babeu, Detective Bob Backes, Robert C Bartlemay, Sr and others
Petitioner:
Andrew Kwasi Donkor
Defendant:
M Mandosa
Roy Nakashima v. Ben Curry, et al
as 11-17430
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY HIROSHI NAKASHIMA
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS
Walker v. Grounds et al
as 3:2011cv04997
Petitioner:
Michael Angelo Walker
Respondent:
Randy Grounds, Board of Parole Hearings and Arnold Schwarzenegger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jaime Martinez v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-56555
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and GARY SWARHOUT, Warden
Nakashima v. Curry et al
as 3:2011cv04463
Petitioner:
Roy H. Nakashima
Respondent:
Ben Curry, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steven Adams v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 11-16851
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN ADAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, BPH CHAIRMAN and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
Ricardo Hernandez v. Michael Martel, et al
as 11-16398
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
