Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Santoyo Avalos v. B.O.P.
as 4:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Leonel Santoyo Avalos
Respondent:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Salas-Garcia v. US Attorney General et al
as 4:2012cv00128
Respondent:
B.O.P., DHS, GEO Group and others
Petitioner:
Jose Ernesto Salas-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soto v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00055
Respondent:
B.I.C.E., US Attorney General, US B.O.P. and others
Petitioner:
Maikel Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes v. Federal B.O.P. et al
as 1:2011cv00076
Petitioner:
Felipe L Reyes
Respondent:
Federal B.O.P., Reality House Halfway House and Texas Dept of Motor Vehicle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Oppenhammer v. B.O.P.
as 6:2011cv00065
Respondent:
B.O.P.
Petitioner:
Lisa N Oppenhammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oppenhammer v. B.O.P.
as 3:2011cv00402
Respondent:
B.O.P.
Petitioner:
Lisa N Oppenhammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez-Lerma v. Hall et al
as 4:2010cv00084
Respondent:
Director of B.O.P., Warden Keith Hall, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Rene Martinez-Lerma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia-Aguilera v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00024
Respondent:
B.O.P., United States Of America and Warden
Petitioner:
Cesar Valentin Garcia-Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campos v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00025
Defendant:
B.O.P., United States Of America and Warden RCDC III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gil v. B.O.P. et al
as 4:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Guillermo Gil
Respondent:
B.O.P. and U.S.M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
