Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Nesbitt v. Adams et al
as 4:2020cv00148
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Derrick Nesbitt
Respondent:
Robert Adams, Jr., Brian Owens and Terry Barnard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2020cv01696
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles, Jacquline Bunn, Esq,, United States District Court, Georgia and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELLISON v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Respondent:
JACQULINE BUNN, BRIAN OWENS, DAVID J HERRING and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TEEMS v. OWENS
as 5:2018cv00259
Petitioner:
JIMMY RAY TEEMS
Respondent:
BRIAN OWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roller v. Mills et al
as 1:2018cv03242
Respondent:
Braxton Cotton, Jacqueline Bunn, Terry Barnard and others
Petitioner:
Jackie Ray Roller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Kerlin v. Terry Barnard, et al
as 18-11221
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK KERLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY BARNARD, Chairman, JAMES MILLS, Vice Chairman, BRAXTON COTTON, Member and others
Clarke v. Dozier et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Petitioner:
Jerome Clarke
Respondent:
Gregory C. Dozier, Antoine Caldwell, Terry E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kerlin v. Barnard et al
as 4:2017cv00174
Petitioner:
Mark Kerlin
Respondent:
Terry Barnard, James Mills, Braxton Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rose v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv02778
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Rose
Defendant:
James W. Mills, Terry Barnard, Jacqueline Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAKER v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner:
RODERICK DOUGLASS BAKER
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E BARNARD, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
