Cases 1 - 10 of 90
ANDERSON v. BROWN
as 2:2024cv01973
Petitioner:
QUINCY RAHSAAN ANDERSON
Respondent:
Kim Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gama-Perez v. Brown
as 2:2023cv03818
Petitioner:
Josue Gama-Perez
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Brown
Respondent:
Warden, London Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booker-Brown v. Gray
as 5:2023cv01349
Petitioner:
Ernest A Booker-Brown
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Booker-Brown v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv02148
Petitioner:
Ernest A Booker-Brown
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv00753
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Foley
as 3:2023cv00389
Petitioner:
Christopher Brown
Respondent:
Warden Keith Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown, Jr. v. Garza
as 4:2022cv02021
Petitioner:
Johnny C. Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Fender
as 4:2022cv01284
Petitioner:
Spencer Brown
Respondent:
Warden Douglas A. Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
