Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Curry v. City of Hillsboro et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
Anthony Lenaire Curry
Respondent:
City of Hillsboro and County of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klingensmith v. Tillamook City Police et al
as 3:2017cv00517
Petitioner:
David Christopher Klingensmith
Respondent:
Tillamook City Police, Tillamook County Commissioners and Tillamook County Libraries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klingensmith v. Tillamook County District Attorneys Office et al
as 3:2017cv00461
Petitioner:
David Christopher Klingensmith
Respondent:
Oregon Judicial Department, Tillamook City Police, Tillamook County District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giffen v. Oregon State Hospital et al
as 6:2013cv02067
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, City of Springfield Oregon, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and others
Petitioner:
Todd Giffen
Unknown:
Lane County Jail and Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. City of Portland et al
as 1:2011cv00460
Respondent:
City of Portland, Multnomah County and State of Oregon
Petitioner:
Ronald Bruce Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster v. The State of Oregon et al
as 2:2011cv00225
Respondent:
County of Multnomah, Adam Gibbs, Ron Hoesly and others
Petitioner:
Brent Evan Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2007cv00868
Petitioner:
Martin Everett Rivers
Respondent:
State of Oregon, Fourth Judicial Distric Judges, Michael Schrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
