Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lumpkin v. Western State Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01079
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr
Respondent:
Western State Hospital and City of Bellevue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. City of Seattle
as 2:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Respondent:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2022cv05972
Petitioner:
Jared J Bailey
Respondent:
Thurston County and City of Olympia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagos v. City of Seattle
as 2:2019cv01326
Respondent:
City of Seattle
Petitioner:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winningham v. Lynnwood City Municipal Court et al
as 2:2017cv00232
Petitioner:
Adam James Winningham
Respondent:
Lynnwood City Municipal Court and Lynnwood City Municipal Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taamu v. City of Everett
as 2:2014cv01826
Petitioner:
Brandia Taamu
Respondent:
City of Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taamu v. City of Everett
as 2:2014cv01271
Petitioner:
Brandia Taamu
Respondent:
City of Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crawford v. City Attorney Office for City of Bellingham, WA et al
as 2:2014cv00668
Petitioner:
Arthur Crawford, Jr.
Respondent:
City Attorney Office for City of Bellingham, WA and AAG's Office for City of Bellingham, WA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winn v. City of Edmonds et al
as 2:2012cv02133
Petitioner:
Daniel Winn
Respondent:
City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, CFS Contractors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Eng et al
as 2:2012cv02016
Petitioner:
Troy Martin
Respondent:
Park D. Eng, John Urquhart and City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
