Cases 1 - 7 of 7
STODDARD v. DIRECTOR OF THE COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv01338
Petitioner:
KEITH OLIVER STODDARD
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Kruger et al
as 1:2013cv00595
Petitioner:
Edward Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Kruger and Court Service and Offender Supervision Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARVEY v. U.S. FEDERAL PROBATION & PAROLE/COURT SERVICE AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01630
Petitioner:
FERDELL F. HARVEY
Respondent:
U.S. FEDERAL PROBATION & PAROLE/COURT SERVICE AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BEANE v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01711
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL BEANE
Respondent:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDERS SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and U. S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01712
Petitioner:
MILTON JONES
Respondent:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and U. S. MARSHAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAILEY v. COURT SERVICE AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY et al
as 1:2007cv01501
Plaintiff:
JEROME BAILEY
Defendant:
COURT SERVICE AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PHILLIPS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv01339
Petitioner:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDERS SUPERVISION AGENCY (CSOSA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
