Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Curry v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Curry
Defendant:
B. Wingfield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Settlemires et al
as 3:2019cv00251
Petitioner:
Willie Earl Curry
Respondent:
Roger Settlemires and Attorney General Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Nash
as 3:2019cv00349
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden C. Nash
Plaintiff:
Ricky Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curry v. Nash
as 3:2019cv00295
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Curry
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Cheron Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curry v. Monroe Circuit Court et al
as 1:2014cv00132
Petitioner:
James Curry
Respondent:
Monroe Circuit Court and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Pounds et al
as 1:2013cv00149
Petitioner:
James Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Pounds , Lee County , Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. MDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
James Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
MDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Everette et al
as 5:2009cv00194
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
K. Everette, Elizabeth Foster, Lisa Chisolm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Pearson et al
as 5:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, FCC Yazoo City (Low), Eden White and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Banks v. Reese et al
as 5:2008cv00012
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Eden White, Christopher Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
