Cases 1 - 10 of 30
SAXON v. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2014cv06037
Petitioner:
JEAN SAXON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMASON v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2014cv04039
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMASON
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS, R. SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUCKETT v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2014cv03710
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE DUCKETT
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS, SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOWLER v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2014cv02604
Petitioner:
ABDUL J. FOWLER
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mays v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv00827
Respondent:
John Wetzel, PA State Attorney General and David Pitkins
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD v. PITKINS
as 2:2014cv02436
Petitioner:
DENNIS HOWARD
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODSON v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2014cv02199
Petitioner:
MAURICE WOODSON
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STROUD v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2014cv01759
Petitioner:
JESSE ANDERSON STROUD
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McManus v. Pitkins et al
as 1:2014cv00470
Petitioner:
John M. McManus
Respondent:
David Pitkins and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMILEY v. PITKINS et al
as 2:2014cv00807
Petitioner:
ANDRE SMILEY
Respondent:
DAVID PITKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
