Cases 1 - 10 of 56
ADAN v. DOE
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burress v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv02636
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden John Doe of Robert A Deyton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILLIARD EL-BEY v. LYNN et al
as 7:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL LEE HILLIARD EL-BEY
Respondent:
Captain STEPHEN D LYNN, RONALD L DAVIS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHANDLER v. STRAUDER et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JAKALE E CHANDLER
Defendant:
OFFICER STRAUDER, OFFICER WOODS, OFFICER POWEL and others
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Littlejohn v. Owens et al
as 1:2021cv03169
Petitioner:
Timothy Littlejohn
Respondent:
Craig Owens, Flynn Broady, Chief Leonard, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOUSTON v. PEARCE et al
as 7:2020cv00250
Petitioner:
ERIC HOUSTON
Respondent:
WARDEN PEARCE, Nurse CASEY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILES v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2020cv00278
Petitioner:
LEROY C MILES
Respondent:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, DEPUTY ELLERSON, CPT HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
