Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hajati v. Probation
as 3:2022cv00887
Petitioner:
Gerorge Hajati
Respondent:
United States Department of Probation, Bronx Community Reentry Center, U.S. Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Keels v. Richards et al
as 3:2021cv00751
Defendant:
Wtby, Police Department, Michale Richards and Waterbury Police Dept
Plaintiff:
James Keels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holley v. McCormick et al
as 3:2020cv01663
Respondent:
Maureen Keegan, Ned McCormick, Middletown Police Dept. and others
Petitioner:
Kenny Roosevelt Holley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Velez v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv01897
Respondent:
Other Unnamed Staff, Unnamed Medical Staff, Warden Catricia L Howard and others
Petitioner:
Pedro Velez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Skelly v. Corrections
as 3:2011cv00658
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Skelly
Respondent:
Dept. Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crespo v. Commissioner, CT Dept of Correction
as 3:2011cv00053
Petitioner:
Jose Crespo
Respondent:
Commissioner, CT Dept of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lara v. California Dept of Corr & Rehabilitation
as 3:2010cv01080
Petitioner:
Jorge Ricardo Lara
Respondent:
California Dept of Corr & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. Saba et al
as 3:2010cv00504
Petitioner:
Angel Hernandez
Respondent:
James Saba and Enfield Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Dept of Corrections
as 3:2009cv02125
Plaintiff:
Tobias C. Anderson
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Dept of Corr et al
as 3:2009cv00876
Petitioner:
Anthony Hargrove
Respondent:
Dept of Corr and Med Mental Health of DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
