Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Forte v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv04378
Petitioner:
Calvin Deondre Forte
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00095
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tanksley v. Fort
as 1:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Jordash Tanksley
Respondent:
Fort
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. FORT
as 1:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KARL FORT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Fort
as 1:2022cv04710
Petitioner:
Delmon Peters
Respondent:
Karl Fort and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenzie v. Ford
as 1:2022cv04577
Petitioner:
Jermaine McKenzie
Respondent:
Warden Karl Ford and Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. FORT
as 1:2022cv04490
Petitioner:
MARVIN A SCOTT
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Corrections and Warden Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Fort et al
as 1:2022cv04288
Petitioner:
Marvin Manning
Respondent:
Warden Fort and Augusta State Medical Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz-Morales v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00127
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Diaz-Morales
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gutierrez v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Julio Cuero Gutierrez
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
