General Cases filed in Wisconsin
Stowe, Graham v. Van Rybroek, Gregory We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00400
Petitioner: Graham L. Stowe
Respondent: Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Graham v. Hepp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00333
Petitioner: Roland Derliel Graham
Respondent: Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pettigrew v. Humphreys et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00210
Petitioner: Nathan J Pettigrew
Respondent: Robert Humphreys and Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bohardt v. Graham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01113
Petitioner: Randy O Bohardt
Respondent: Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wesley v. Huibregtse et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00700
Petitioner: Battites Wesley
Respondent: Peter Huibregtse, Rick Raemisch and Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akbar v. Thurmer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01045
Petitioner: Talib Amin Akbar
Respondent: Michael S Thurmer, Alfonso J Graham and Jayne A Hackbarth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Raemisch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00238
Petitioner: Willie Roy Love
Respondent: Rick Raemisch and Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pettigrew v. RAEMISCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00691
Petitioner: Nathan J. Pettigrew
Defendant: RICK RAEMISCH and Alfonso Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?