Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Crosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1300
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, ADX and M. BANUELOS, Former, DHO
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Respondent:
A. CILLIO, Warden, K. MANDABON MARTINEZ, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Cosby v. Cillio, et al
as 24-1271
Respondent:
BOP, (NCRO), A. CILLIO, Warden, AW (PROGRAMS) COMPLEX and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01435
Respondent:
M. Banuelos and A. Ciolli
Petitioner:
Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D Cosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Crosby (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Petitioner:
Gregory D. Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli and Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1146
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, AW PROGRAMS COMPLEX, CMC COMPLEX and others
Cosby v. Cillio, et al
as 23-1100
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent / Appellee:
A. CILLIO, Warden, DITO BANELOOS, Lt., Officer and J. HOLBROOK, Correctional Counselor
Cosby v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2022cv03119
Petitioner:
Gregory D Cosby, Gregory D Cosmo Crosby and Gregory D Crosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, AW Programs Complex, CMC Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crosby v. Warden ADX, et al
as 22-1173
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY, AKA Gregory D. Cosby
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ADX, LT. BANELOUS, DHO Hearing Officer and J. HOLBROOK, Correctional Counselor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
