Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 1:2019cv00847
Respondent:
Georgia Board of Pardons, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, WARDEN JERMANE WHITE and others
Petitioner:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Respondent:
CHAIRMAN JAMES W MILLS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Petitioner:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roller v. Mills et al
as 1:2018cv03242
Respondent:
Braxton Cotton, Jacqueline Bunn, Terry Barnard and others
Petitioner:
Jackie Ray Roller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wasif v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2015cv00422
Petitioner:
Mohammad Wasif
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wasif v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2015cv00081
Petitioner:
Mohammad Wasif
Respondent:
United States Of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bearden v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02254
Petitioner:
Rodney Bearden
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, Albert Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Laughlin et al
as 3:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Laughlin et al
as 4:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TOENNIGES v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2013cv00123
Petitioner:
DONALD WAYNE TOENNIGES
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Drew v. Hart et al
as 1:2013cv02439
Petitioner:
Willie Dewayne Drew
Respondent:
Darrell Hart, Brian Owens, Neil Warren and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
