General Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Payton v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00152
Respondent: Josh Davis
Petitioner: Glen Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payton v. Davis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00098
Respondent: Josh Davis
Petitioner: Glen Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Errington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00158
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Joe Errington
Plaintiff: Glen Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00100
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Joseph Errington
Plaintiff: Glen Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payton v. Turner
as 2:2019cv00109
Plaintiff: Glen Payton
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Superintendent Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashton v. Nash We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00170
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Glen Ashton
Respondent: Cheron Y. Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moffite v. Lauderdale County
as 3:2017cv00474
Plaintiff: Glen Lavelle Moffite
Defendant: Lauderdale County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Payton v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2017cv00065
Plaintiff: Glen Payton, Jr.
Defendant: State of Mississippi and Unknown Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montalto v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00457
Plaintiff: Stephen Daniel Montalto
Defendant: Mississippi Department of Corrections, Marshall Fisher, Glen McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craft v. Epps, et al
as 2:2008cv00025
Plaintiff: Glen Craft
Defendant: Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?