Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KINARD v. HOWARD
as 1:2020cv03112
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KINARD
Defendant:
CATRICIA HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ORJI v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01004
Respondent:
JOHN DOE, MARTHA DOE, CATRICIA HOWARD and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ORJI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD v. SMITH
as 1:2016cv00617
Petitioner:
DONNELL L. HOWARD
Respondent:
WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARBISON v. BECK et al
as 1:2011cv01900
Plaintiff:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID BECK, WILLIAM NEELY and HOWARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
MCFADDEN v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2011cv01658
Plaintiff:
TRACY MCFADDEN
Defendant:
SIMON T. WAINWRIGHT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
BARRY BERNARD MARTIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , ERIC HOLDER, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTINEZ v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE IMMIGRATION REVIEW et al
as 1:2011cv00986
Petitioner:
ROBINSON MARTINEZ
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE IMMIGRATION REVIEW, HOWARD ROSE and JEFERRY MARTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2009cv00857
Plaintiff:
CLINTON HOWARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIER et al v. MADACHY et al
as 1:2008cv00719
Petitioner:
DOROTHY DIER and JERRY L. DIER
Respondent:
PHYLLIS MADACHY, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, PEGGY RIGHTENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
