Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Bradley, Jr. v. Suthers, et al
as 11-1271
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMIE CHARLES BRADLEY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado and HOYT BRILL
Nunn v. Brill, et al
as 11-1079
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYFEAL RAYMOND NUNN
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYT BRILL, Warden of CCA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medicine Blanket v. Brill, et al
as 10-1346
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES MEDICINE BLANKET
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYTE BRILL, Warden, K.C.C.C. and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rea v. Suthers, et al
as 10-1320
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. REA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado and HOYTE BRILL, Warden
Field v. Brill et al
as 1:2010cv00255
Petitioner:
Michael C. Field
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Portley-El v. Brill, et al
as 09-1544
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK DURAY PORTLEY-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYT BRILL, Warden, KCCC and CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Portley-El v. Brill, et al
as 09-1545
Petitioner - Appellant:
PATRICK DURAY PORTLEY-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
HOYT BRILL, Warden, KCCC and CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Smith v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv02559
Petitioner:
Tye J. Smith
Respondent:
Hoyt Brill and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Jackson, et al
as 09-1429
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH E. FRAZIER
Respondent - Appellee:
HEARING OFFICER JACKSON, WARDEN HOYT BRILL, Private prisons Monitoring Unit Designee John Doe and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Frazier v. Jackson et al
as 1:2009cv01789
Petitioner:
Keith Frazier
Respondent:
Jackson, Hoyt Brill and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
