Cases 1 - 10 of 366
Stark, Jr. v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50236
Petitioner:
Ivan J. Stark, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lard v. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
as 4:2024cv04074
Petitioner:
Ellis J Lard
Respondent:
Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Northern District of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03856
Petitioner:
Jerome R. Johnson
Respondent:
Northern District of Illinois and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lannan v. Greenville FPC
as 3:2023cv02093
Petitioner:
Rebecca J. Lannan
Respondent:
Greenville FPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Respondent:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Sheldon J. Oliver
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cole v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01354
Petitioner:
Adrien J Cole
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Landtrust et al
as 3:2022cv02371
Petitioner:
Jerome Johnson
Defendant:
Landtrust, John Doe, Jane Doe 1 and others
Respondent:
J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Gonzalez
as 3:2022cv50355
Petitioner:
Joshua J. Moore
Respondent:
D. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gonzalez v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Conrad J Gonzalez
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
