Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Reed-Jones v. O'Donnell
as 3:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
Aaron Reed-Jones
Respondent:
Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Veterans
as 3:2017cv01905
Petitioner:
Cynthia Jones
Respondent:
Veterans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv01021
Petitioner:
Scott M. Jones
Unknown:
Lisa Hay
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Coursey
as 2:2013cv02167
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Steward
as 3:2013cv02066
Petitioner:
Jodie F. Jones
Respondent:
Heidi Steward
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hersha v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv02279
Petitioner:
Frank Leroy Hersha, Jr.
Parole Supervisor:
Mark Jones
Respondent:
State of Oregon and Kristin Winges-Yanez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Franke
as 2:2012cv01677
Respondent:
Steve Franke
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Jessie Lewis Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Franke
as 2:2011cv01527
Respondent:
Steve Franke
Petitioner:
James Louis Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Franke
as 3:2010cv01474
Respondent:
Steve Franke
Petitioner:
Scott Douglas Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. DeCamp
as 6:2010cv00697
Respondent:
Joe DeCamp
Petitioner:
Clarence Allen Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
