Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Morgan et al v. United States et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowe v. Pettigrew
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2020cv00949
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lowe
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowe v. Oklahoma State of
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2020cv00427
Petitioner:
Ronald Dean Lowe
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowe v. Bear
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2017cv00406
Petitioner:
Jack A. Lowe
Respondent:
Carl Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowe v. McCollum et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2013cv00791
Petitioner:
Walter Douglas Lowe
Respondent:
Tracy McCollum and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe v. Addison et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2008cv00436
Petitioner:
Jack A Lowe
Respondent:
Mike Addison and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lowe v. Addison et al
as 5:2008cv00887
Petitioner:
Jack A Lowe
Respondent:
Mike Addison and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.