Cases 1 - 10 of 206
GREEN v. DIXON
as 1:2022cv00271
Petitioner:
CHARLES A GREEN
Defendant:
Sec. Mark S. Inch
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. DIXON
as 3:2022cv17474
Petitioner:
PAUL BURNS
Respondent:
MARK S INCH and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. DIXON
as 3:2022cv02657
Petitioner:
REGINALD SHERROD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON and MARK S INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernando Hinestroza v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-10560
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO IVAN HINESTROZA
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Turner v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Zachary Keith Turner
Respondent:
Mark S. Inch, Department of Corrections and Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferro v. Inch.
as 1:2021cv24097
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ferro and Nicholas Christopher Ferro
Respondent:
Secretary Mark S. Inch.
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1260
Serrano v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2021cv62353
Petitioner:
Christian Serrano
Respondent:
Mark S. Inch and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Solomon v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00807
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Solomon, III
Defendant:
Secretary Mark S. Inch and Attorney General Ashley B. Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffiin v. Inch et al
as 2:2021cv00774
Petitioner:
Jonas Tramell Griffiin and Jonas Tramell Griffin
Defendant:
Secretary Mark S. Inch and Attorney General Ashley B. Moody
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Columbia v. Mark Inch
as 2:2021cv00773
Petitioner:
John Russell Columbia
Respondent:
Florida D.O.C. and Secretary Mark S. Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
