Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Coyne v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2023cv00700
Petitioner:
James Coyne
Respondent:
Commissioner Ann Marie T. Sullivan and New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Ann Marie T. Sullivan
as 1:2022cv02794
Petitioner:
Rafael A. Jones
Respondent:
Joseph Caputo and Ann Marie T. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dennis E. (Anonymous) v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv02171
Respondent:
Eric Gonzalez and Commissioner Ann Marie T. Sullivan
Petitioner:
Dennis E. (Anonymous)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Babyrev v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv03432
Petitioner:
Vadim Babyrev
Respondent:
Dr. Brian Belfi and Ann Marie T. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Babyrev v. Belfi et al
as 1:2019cv11693
Petitioner:
Babyrev Vadim and Vadim Babyrev
Respondent:
Brian Belfi and Ann Marie T.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roache v. State Of New York et al
as 9:2017cv00574
Petitioner:
Walter J. Roache
Respondent:
State of New York and Ann Marie T. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fair v. Annucci et al
as 9:2016cv01434
Petitioner:
Keith Darnell Fair
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci, Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Jacob Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roache v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06966
Petitioner:
Walter J. Roache
Respondent:
State Of New York and Ann Marie T. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walston v. Sullvan et al
as 1:2016cv03662
Petitioner:
Daniel Walston
Respondent:
Ann Marie T. Sullvan and Commissioner of New York City Dept. of Correction, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Neil v. Sullivan, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv03695
Petitioner:
Tyrone Neil
Respondent:
Dr. Ann Marie T. Sullivan, M.D. and Office of Mental Health of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
