Cases 1 - 10 of 32
BLACKSTONE v. PLATKIN et al
as 3:2024cv06127
Petitioner:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, N.J. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, N.J. STATE GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
DAWUD FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TACCETTA v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
MARTIN TACCETTA
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALGAS v. BURLINGTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv22125
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALGAS
Respondent:
BURLINGTON COUNTY and MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEPHENS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv09889
Petitioner:
MATTHEW A. STEPHENS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMAS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
DONALD THOMAS and DONALD M. THOMAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALVARADO v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv01192
Petitioner:
JORGE ALVARADO
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, WARDEN and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMART v. LEITH
as 1:2022cv02250
Petitioner:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Respondent:
WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCBRIDE v. KUHN et al
as 3:2022cv02016
Petitioner:
KEITH MCBRIDE
Respondent:
VICTORIA L. KUHN and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CORNEJO v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2020cv04580
Respondent:
Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, THOMAS DECKER, RON EDWARDS and others
Petitioner:
Noe Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
