Cases 1 - 10 of 574
Dial v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00059
Petitioner:
Diana Dial
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amir-Sharif v. Director TDCJ Nathaniel A. Quarterman et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Oscar Mendoza, ., Tony Samaniego and others
Petitioner:
Lakeith Amir-Sharif
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lobo Miller v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00459
Petitioner:
Eric Wayne Lobo Miller
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan v. Quarterman
as 7:2009cv00121
Petitioner:
Christopher David Ryan
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solomon v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00048
Petitioner:
Thomas Jefferson Solomon
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00802
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Myles
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klein v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00688
Petitioner:
Justin J. Klein
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00684
Petitioner:
Alexis Ramos
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00678
Petitioner:
Ronald J. Mitchell, Jr.
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slatton v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00671
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Slatton
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
