Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anthony Blackwell v. Roderick Hickman
as 13-15285
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY M. BLACKWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN
Robert Feiger v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 11-55585
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JEFFRY FEIGER
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General
Robert Feiger v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 08-56495
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JEFFRY FEIGER
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General
Miguel Mendoza v. Roderick Hickman
as 08-56093
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL MENDOZA
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, Secretary California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Destinni Mardesich v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 08-55404
Petitioner - Appellant:
DESTINNI MARDESICH
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOSEPH MCGRATH, Chief Deputy Secretary for Adult Operations, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOHN DOVEY, Director of Division of Adult Institutions, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Schrey v. Hickman, et al
as 08-55200
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL PETER SCHREY
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and JAMES A. YATES, Warden of the Pleasant Valley State Prison
Ali v. Hickman
as 07-16731
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOHAMMED HAROON ALI
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, Director California Department of Corrections
Jason Scott Harper v. Roderick Q Hickman et al
as 5:2007cv01088
Petitioner:
Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
Roderick Q Hickman and Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Morrison v. Roderick Q Hickman
as 2:2005cv08148
Petitioner:
Michael Morrison
Respondent:
Roderick Q Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
