Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Melissa Sue Rogers v. LaVelle Parker
as 5:2024cv01789
Petitioner:
Melissa Sue Rogers
Respondent:
Lavelle Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taquan Rahshe Gullet-El v. Merrick B. Garland
as 2:2024cv05812
Respondent:
Robert G. Luna, Erica Choi, Michael W. Fitzgerald and others
Petitioner:
Taquan Rahshe Gullet-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Rogers v. San Joaquin Superior Court, et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Roger Hood v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv02903
Petitioner:
Daniel Roger Hood
Respondent:
Warden, Superior Court of San Diego and County of San Diego of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher, Mr. Rogers and Mr. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Fountain v. Price
as 1:2023cv00708
Petitioner:
Ernest Roger Fountain, Jr.
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Rogers v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Maurice Di Aundra Rogers
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Benevides
as 4:2022cv05485
Petitioner:
Michael D. Rogers
Respondent:
Warden J. Benevides
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Fountain v. Director
as 1:2022cv01231
Petitioner:
Ernest Roger Fountain, Jr.
Respondent:
Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Saesee v. Lynch
as 2:2022cv01526
Petitioner:
Roger Saesee
Respondent:
Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.