Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Romero v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2022cv00873
Petitioner:
Abel Romero
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Romero v. LNU et al
as 2:2022cv00730
Petitioner:
Joshua D Romero
Respondent:
FNU LNU and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Lorenzo A. Salas
Respondent:
Leon Martinez, Anthony Romero and Hector H. Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto et al v. Governor of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Petitioner:
Patrick Hopkins, Dainte D Sanders, Jonathan Duran and others
Respondent:
Governor of the State of New Mexico and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Martinez et al
as 1:2019cv00467
Plaintiff:
Andrew Romero
Defendant:
Hector Balderas and Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. State of New Mexico
as 1:2019cv00081
Petitioner:
Michael R Romero
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00801
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Officer R. Martinez and New Mexico, State of
Petitioner:
Felix G. Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quintana-Romero v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv01031
Petitioner:
Juan Quintana-Romero
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adamo v. Romero et al.
as 2:2014cv00838
Plaintiff:
Brian Thomas Adamo
Defendant:
Raymond L. Romero, Davis Rutherford Ruark, Debra Lautenschlager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Hatch
as 1:2012cv01082
Petitioner:
Estevan Phillip Romero
Respondent:
Timothy Hatch and The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
