Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Woods v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaime Rivera v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-16001
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAIME RIVERA
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, THE PEOPLE and PATRICK COVELLO, Warden
Hickson v. Broomfield
as 1:2023cv03233
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Hickson
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irving v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv02949
Petitioner:
Daniel D Irving
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Joseph Ochoa v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-15836
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH OCHOA, Administrative Law Judge and JOSEPH OCHOA
Respondent / Appellee:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California
Jon Goldberg v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-15053
Petitioner / Appellant:
JON GOLDBERG
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD and RONALD BROOMFIELD
Vernon Evans v. Ron Broomfield
as 2:2023cv00244
Petitioner:
Vernon Evans
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paschall v. Broomfield
as 3:2022cv08518
Petitioner:
Lamar S. Paschall
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noel Jackson v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-55937
Petitioner:
NOEL JACKSON
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
