General Cases filed in Maine
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JORDAN v. KANE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner: MARK R JORDAN
Respondent: SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GOOZEY v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00181
Petitioner: STEVEN R GOOZEY
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00167
Petitioner: BRANDON S BROWN
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INMAN v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00243
Plaintiff: FRANK INMAN
Defendant: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATHGATE v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00221
Petitioner: PETER GEORGE BATHGATE, II
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INMAN v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00113
Petitioner: FRANK INMAN
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LANE v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00036
Petitioner: JOHN AMOS LANE
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00439
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER R MARTIN
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ERICSON v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00315
Petitioner: ERIC ERICSON
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ABBOTT v. BURNHEIMER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00037
Petitioner: DREW G ABBOTT
Defendant: SCOTT BURNHEIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?