Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Smith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 1:2023cv14758
Petitioner:
Eric S Smith
Respondent:
People of The State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv03258
Petitioner:
Eric S. Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv00737
Petitioner:
Eric S Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2023cv50018
Petitioner:
Tyrese Smith
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Truitt
as 1:2022cv05747
Petitioner:
Keenon Smith
Respondent:
Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Feeney et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Joseph L Harris
Respondent:
Charles Feeney, Matthew Smith, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grubbs-Mahood v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01216
Petitioner:
Cindy Grubbs-Mahood
Respondent:
Matt Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 2:2022cv02038
Petitioner:
Tavoris Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner:
Charles Hamilton
Respondent:
Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Evans
as 1:2021cv05580
Petitioner:
Walter Smith
Respondent:
Michelle Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
