Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheets v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv05999
Petitioner:
Mulik Sheets
Respondent:
Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv03524
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamar Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble v. GDC Commissioner et al
as 6:2020cv00112
Respondent:
GDC Commissioner, Warden Trevona Bobbitt and Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. Commissioner of G.D.C. et al
as 6:2020cv00102
Respondent:
Commissioner of G.D.C. and Trevonza Bobbitt
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2020cv00103
Respondent:
Warden Trevonze Bobbit, GDC Commissioner, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Brawner
as 1:2020cv00129
Petitioner:
Karl Erwin King
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Trevonza Bobbitt and Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nyepah v. Bobbitt
as 1:2020cv03206
Petitioner:
Menshack Nyepah
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUBLE v. BRAWNER
as 1:2019cv00126
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
CARL IVAN DOUBLE
Respondent:
Trevonza Bobbitt and Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUBLE v. BOBBITT
as 5:2019cv00282
Petitioner:
CARL IVAN DOUBLE
Respondent:
TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
