Cases 1 - 10 of 12
VASQUEZ-DIAZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2022cv04579
Petitioner:
ANGEL VASQUEZ-DIAZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VASQUEZ v. RIVELLO et al
as 5:2022cv02379
Petitioner:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Ebbert
as 3:2018cv00701
Petitioner:
Richard Vasquez Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORALES VASQUEZ v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2017cv03284
Petitioner:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VASQUEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2014cv02759
Petitioner:
FALIPE VASQUEZ
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Strada
as 3:2011cv01710
Petitioner:
George Vasquez
Respondent:
Strada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VASQUEZ v. RYAN et al
as 2:2011cv02300
Petitioner:
JERONIMO VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM H. RYAN, JR. and DAVID HECKLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vasquez-Alcazar v. Ebbert
as 3:2009cv02233
Petitioner:
Jamie Vasquez-Alcazar
Respondent:
Dave Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vasquez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2009cv02049
Petitioner:
Alexis Fernandez Vasquez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Lapin, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes-Vasquez v. Holder
as 1:2009cv00707
Petitioner:
Maximo Antonio Reyes-Vasquez
Respondent:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
