Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Banks v. Federal Correctional Institute
as 2:2018cv01408
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute
Plaintiff:
Robert Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linzy v. Warden
as 1:2017cv01362
Plaintiff:
Aaron Michael Linzy, Sr
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benton v. Federal Correctional Institute
as 5:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Horatio Benton
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deaderick v. Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
as 2:2015cv01841
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Deaderick
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Secatero v. Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale 2
as 2:2015cv00947
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale 2
Plaintiff:
Stanley Secatero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. Federal Correctional Institute
as 1:2014cv03295
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Louis Reid
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
as 2:2014cv03155
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griffin v. Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
as 2:2014cv00823
Plaintiff:
Willie J Griffin, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
as 2:2012cv02734
Plaintiff:
James B Mitchell
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Long v. Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
as 2:2012cv02615
Plaintiff:
Rodney A Long
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
