Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Carter v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-8054
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL HARLOW, Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden and RICK WHITE, Red Onion State Prison Warden
Fairbourn v. Harlow, et al
as 22-8005
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY ROSS FAIRBOURN
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Weldon v. Pacheco, et al
as 17-8030
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE WELDON
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL PACHECO, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary, Wyoming Department of Corrections and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Counts v. Wilson, et al
as 17-8003
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER COUNTS
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary and WYOMING ATTORNEY GEN
Sullivan v. Wilson, et al
as 16-8101
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONTY SULLIVAN
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary and ROBERT LAMPERT, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections
Bhutto v. Wilson
as 16-8027
Petitioner - Appellant:
REHAN ALI BHUTTO
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary
Bird v. Wilson
as 16-8001
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHESTER LOYDE BIRD
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary
Daves v. Wilson
as 15-8087
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD RAY DAVES
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary
Best v. Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden
as 1:2015cv00085
Petitioner:
Joseph Newton Best
Respondent:
Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden and Wyoming Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mares v. Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden
as 2:2015cv00046
Petitioner:
Edwin Ike Mares
Respondent:
Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
