Cases 1 - 10 of 11,555
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxton v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Terry Saxton
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPMAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
YAQUAN LAVETT SANDY CHAPMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Roger Ussery
Respondent:
State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Sheriff Bobb
as 1:2024cv02124
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Thomas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savalli v. Gulledge
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Ryan Douglas Savalli
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Gulledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Tavarres Henderson and Juhiiv Ali Muhammed
Respondent:
Mr Terry Bernard
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
