Cases 1 - 10 of 3,693
Knutson, Jeremy v. Lenzner, George et al
as 3:2024cv00665
Respondent:
Nick Prey, Jess Hoffman, Chris Madle and others
Petitioner:
Jeremy Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith, Lee v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00666
Respondent:
E. Emmerich
Petitioner:
Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beyer, Jacob v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00659
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Petitioner:
Jacob Richard Beyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Antonio-Martinez, Jose v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Jose Alfonso Martinez-Antonio and Jose Antonio-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Padilla v. Judge
as 2:2024cv01165
Petitioner:
Philip J Padilla
Respondent:
Michael T Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Marco A Lopez, Sr
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corrales-Gonzalez, German v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
German Corrales-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Laskoski, Brian v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00636
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Petitioner:
Brian Laskoski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underwood v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Robert Richard Underwood
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kavaja, Aleksandar v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00620
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Petitioner:
Aleksandar Kavaja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
